首页> 外文OA文献 >Distance education methods are useful for delivering education to palliative caregivers: A single-arm trial of an education package (PalliativE Caregivers Education Package)
【2h】

Distance education methods are useful for delivering education to palliative caregivers: A single-arm trial of an education package (PalliativE Caregivers Education Package)

机译:远程教育方法对于向姑息照护者提供教育很有用:教育方案的单臂试验(PalliativE照护者教育方案)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Face-to-face/group education for palliative caregivers is successful, but relies on caregivers travelling, being absent from\udthe patient, and rigid timings. This presents inequities for those in rural locations.\udAim: To design and test an innovative distance-learning educational package (PrECEPt: PalliativE Caregivers Education Package).\udDesign: Single-arm mixed-method feasibility proof-of-concept trial (ACTRN12616000601437). The primary outcome was carer\udself-efficacy, with secondary outcomes focused on caregiver preparedness and carer tasks/needs. Analysis focused on three outcome\udmeasures (taken at baseline and 6 weeks) and feasibility/acceptability qualitative data.\udSetting and participants: A single specialist palliative care service. Eligible informal caregivers were those of patients registered\udwith the outpatient or community service, where the patient had a prognosis of ⩾12 weeks, supporting someone with nutrition/\udhydration and/or pain management needs, proficient in English and no major mental health diagnosis.\udResults: Two modules were developed and tested (nutrition/hydration and pain management) with 18 caregivers. The materials did\udnot have a statistically significant impact on carer self-efficacy. However, statistically significant improvements were observed on the\udtwo subsidiary measures of (1) caregiving tasks, consequences and needs (p = 0.03, confidence interval: 0.72, 9.4) and (2) caregiver\udpreparedness (p = 0.001, confidence interval: −1.22, −0.46). The study determined that distance learning is acceptable and feasible for\udboth caregivers and healthcare professionals.\udConclusion: Distance education improves caregiver preparedness and is a feasible and acceptable approach. A two-arm trial\udwould determine whether the materials benefitted caregivers and patients compared to a control group not receiving the materials.\udAdditional modules could be fruitfully developed and offered.
机译:背景:姑息照护者的面对面/小组教育是成功的,但依赖于照护者的出行,不在患者中/患者和严格的时间安排。 \ udAim:设计和测试创新的远程学习教育套件(PrECEPt:PalliativE Caregivers教育套件)。\ udDesign:单臂混合方法可行性概念验证试验(ACTRN12616000601437 )。主要结局是照顾者\自我效能感,次要结局集中在照顾者的准备和照顾者的任务/需求。分析集中于三个结果\测度指标(在基线和6周时采取)和可行性/可接受性定性数据。\ ud环境和参与者:单一的专家姑息治疗服务。合格的非正式护理人员是在门诊或社区服务中登记\的患者,其预后为weeks12周,支持具有营养/脱水和/或疼痛管理需求,精通英语且没有重大精神健康诊断的患者结果:开发了两个模块,并与18位护理人员进行了测试(营养/水合作用和疼痛管理)。这些材料对护理者的自我效能没有统计学上的显着影响。但是,在以下两个辅助度量上观察到了统计学上的显着改善:(1)照料任务,后果和需求(p = 0.03,置信区间:0.72、9.4)和(2)照料者\未准备好(p = 0.001,置信区间: -1.22,-0.46)。该研究确定远程学习对于护理人员和医护人员都是可接受和可行的。\ ud结论:远程教育可以提高护理人员的准备水平,是一种可行且可接受的方法。与不接受该材料的对照组相比,一项两臂试验可以确定该材料是否使护理人员和患者受益。可以开发并提供其他模块。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号